Imports of quartz surface products from China increased by 81% after Cambria filed its petitions at Commerce and ITC, greatly exceeding Commerce’s 15% threshold for supporting a finding of critical circumstances. Both Commerce and the ITC must make affirmative findings of critical circumstances for AD/CVD duties to be applied retroactively.  

This news closely follows Commerce’s announcement that preliminary countervailing duties ranging from 34.38% to 178.45% would be imposed on quartz surface products from China. Commerce’s preliminary determination for the antidumping investigation and announcement of additional antidumping duties are due in November 2018.

An affirmative critical circumstances determination would apply the 34.38% to 178.45% countervailing duties to imports that entered the U.S. on or after June 23, 2018.  If Commerce makes a preliminary antidumping determination, preliminary antidumping duties would be additionally due on imports that entered the U.S. on or after approximately August 15, 2018. These rates are in addition to the Section 301 tariffs announced by the U.S., which took effect on September 24, 2018.

"Cambria is taking this action to stop China’s illegal attempts to flood the market before the imposition of antidumping and countervailing duty orders,” said Marty Davis, president and CEO of Cambria. “Chinese producers and U.S. importers are on notice – substantial duties may be required for any quartz imports since June 2018. We at Cambria and our partners in the industry will continue to stand together to fight back against the illegal efforts to use unfair and unlawful trade practices to exploit the U.S. market.”

Cambria’s petitions allege that the increase in Chinese imports has injured the domestic industry and threatens further damage if duties to offset China’s unfair trade practices are not imposed. Commerce is scheduled to issue preliminary antidumping determinations in November 2018. If both Commerce and the ITC both make final affirmative determinations in their investigations, final duties could be imposed in May or June 2019.

In response to the recent decision by the U.S. Trade Representative, Stone World reached out to Rupesh Shah of MSI for comments on the ruling.

SW: Talk a bit about the results.

RS: MSI has been planning carefully for several months to continue to meet the needs of its valued U.S. customers, notwithstanding both the Section 301 tariff (currently 10% ad valorem) and the antidumping and countervailing investigations on imported quartz surface products from China. I am very concerned, however, about what these border taxes will mean for others in the industry, particularly U.S. fabricators who contribute thousands of jobs, millions of dollars in annual capital investments and hundreds of millions of dollars in annual revenue to the U.S. manufacturing economy.

SW: How do you/MSI feel about the results?

RS: On the Section 301 tariffs, like a host of other industries, it is very challenging because we are caught up in a much larger trade conflict between the USA and China. The outcomes thus were not a real surprise. On the dumping and subsidy case brought by Cambria, the outcomes to date – though disappointing – are also not a surprise. In this Administration, it is exceedingly rare for the U.S. Department of Commerce not to find dumping and subsidization, particularly if the case involves imports from China. I think the success rate for a Petitioner like Cambria before Commerce is in excess of 95%.

SW: How do you and your company plan on moving forward from this?

RS: We are going to fight Cambria’s claims at the ITC, which will decide next year whether imports are causing material injury to the domestic industry producing quartz surface products. The ITC is an independent body that will examine the facts very closely and listen to the views of both sides. The ITC tends to make balanced decisions, and recently ruled against petitioners (such as Cambria) in investigations involving aircraft, car parts, and silicon metal. We think that the facts will bear out that Cambria is doing well and is not being hurt by imports from China. It is clear that Chinese imports don’t compete with Cambria’s products. It is also clear that quartz prices are rising, and that Cambria is making money hand over fist. These are the type of facts that the ITC will scrutinize carefully before making its final injury determination.

SW: How will it affect fabricators?

RS: First, this is going to negatively affect fabricators’ businesses almost immediately. As we all know, fabricators sign contracts with builders and other customers where you can’t simply change the price overnight. While we still await the Anti-Dumping duty, a combination of section 301 and the Countervailing Duty is already above 40%. Fabricators are going to get hit by a combination of reduced demand related to price increases combined with short-term losses where they are not able to increase price immediately. Certain channels such as multi-tenant, builders and entry-level residential remodeling will simply be forced to stop using quartz and move to less labor intensive product categories, ultimately negatively affecting U.S. manufacturing jobs.

Second, and just as significant, is that fabricators are going to have to reduce their choices to their customers as quartz sourced from China becomes economically unpractical. Today, Chinese quartz represents approximately 50% of the market. The factories in China were innovators in many different types of quartz looks, including the most popular looks in the market today such as Carrara, Calacatta and other white marble quartz looks. For many of these colors, there is simply no alternative today from other factories around the world, and for some colors, where there is capacity, there is not enough capacity to meet existing demand. 

Finally, fabricators should know that Cambria is looking to impose these border taxes retroactively on their imports. This could mean that all imports of Chinese quartz that entered the U.S. after the middle of June 2018 will become dramatically more expensive after-the-fact. If Cambria is successful with their desire to impose these taxes retroactively, there are hundreds of fabricators who will get hit with additional duties in the tens, if not hundreds of thousands of dollars. As we know, this could cause severe financial harm to many in the industry. Keep in mind, Cambria is also in the fabrication business and competes with fabricators in many markets across the U.S.

SW: Anything else you want to add that you think is important for fabricators to know?

RS: Cambria has structured its case to try to exclude the fabricators from the ITC injury proceeding. Cambria wants the U.S. Government only to consider its perspective, to the detriment of all others in the industry. That is why Cambria has been unfairly denigrating the fabrication industry during this proceeding. This is a direct quote from Cambria about the fabricators’ role in the industry – fabricators are “operations out of small spaces such as garages with only a couple of employees, a saw and a hand-router.” We know that is not true. In fact, we believe fabricators invest more in capital and machinery per square foot of output and add more value per square foot of installed countertop than is added in the portion of manufacturing of converting quartz sand into slabs. Fabricators account for tens of thousands of U.S. manufacturing jobs compared to just a few hundred manufacturing jobs at Cambria. The fabricators should reach out to the U.S. International Trade Commission as soon as possible in order to let their voices be heard. We need the fabricators to make this point to the U.S. Government, and we need them to do it now.  The best way to do that is to reach out to the Investigators at the ITC in charge of this case. You can find their contact information at https://www.usitc.gov/investigations/701731/2018/quartz_surface_products_china/preliminary.htm.