“In Judaism, there are three main movements - Orthodox, Conservative and Reform,” Alter went on to explain. “All three groups come together for dinner after the service, which is geared towards students. On High Holidays, they have a large service for each separate movement. The groups range from 10 [people], which is technically the minimum amount required, to 30 or 40 that come to the service. They have about 400 to 500 people on High Holidays.”

According to the architect, one of the main problems with the original building was space. “The Conservatives got to have services in the chapel, the Orthodox were in the library, and the Reform movement was in a rump room,” he said. “We wanted to make all the groups feel equal.

The new design

Alter said that the primary design objective for the new 18,000-square-foot center was for the main area of the building to feel like a home away from home for the students - somewhere to invest in everyday life.

“When I was talking with the Rabbi, there were two tasks that he gave me,” said the architect. “To make Judaism seem a part of every day life - not just for special services - and that he didn’t want it to feel like his mother’s living room with the plastic on the couch. Also, he wanted us to make a building that would encourage people to come in.”

Less than 10% of the 50,000 student body is Jewish, and most of the Jewish students weren’t involved in Hillel, according to Alter. “We wanted to bring them closer and bring them in,” he said. “The building is on San Antonio Street - one block west of campus. It is called ‘Religious Row’ because there are about eight different religious institutions there. They are all set up right next to the school.”

The architect explained that most of the buildings on this street are very heavy, solid buildings. “They look like bunkers,” he said. “There is no particular relationship to the street. With this building, we tried to be different. All of the students walk right past it, so we thought that we’d make a building that was proud and exciting. Something that is part of the everyday life of the school, but also welcoming rather than a bunker or monument.”

According to Alter, there is no overall symbolism to the building. “The building, in a way, wasn’t so important,” he said. “We didn’t want to make an object so important, but wanted to make an invitation to come in. In the front, there is a porch with a wooden overhang. It’s always in the shade and gets a breeze. There’s also a little coffee shop inside. The ‘sign’ of the building is actually the students themselves.”

Rather than creating a plaque for a donor wall, names were carved into pieces of Lueders limestone, which were attached to the brick wall - making for a unique design.

Choosing materials

When it came time to select building materials for the new design, masonry and Lueders limestone, which is quarried in the region, were favorites. “The original building was brick,” said Alter. “We were uncomfortable with tearing down a building that had been there for 50 years. We wanted to reuse the original masonry, but it was too expensive. We used a brick that was pretty much an exact match though. The idea of brick was to keep the heritage and memory of the old building alive. Lueders limestone is very beautiful.”

The architect explained that many buildings on the campus of the University of Texas at Austin feature Lueders limestone. For the Hillel’s design, limestone was chosen as accent pieces.

“We inset limestone in the walls for special things,” said Alter. “We thought we would use some limestone and do it well.”

Varying lengths of limestone pieces were used to decorate both exterior and interior walls. “The limestone starts outside and helps with the transition of the building,” said the architect. “The building is all about trying to connect from the inside to the outside. The transition is very casual, and that for me is a very nice thing.”

Alter explained that he didn’t want to create a donor wall that looked like a plaque, so strategically placing the different-sized limestone pieces with donor names carved into them on the wall was something a little more unique. “Using the limestone a little more discreetly, I hope that it is appreciated more and that people appreciate that the donor wall is not just stuck on the wall. It’s decorative at the same time and part of the design.”

The brick and limestone give the building texture and help to achieve the inviting atmosphere that was desired. “The brick has a lot of variegation,” said Alter. “You can see how they were stacked in the kilns. I like that when you get closer, you can see that the brick has a lot of variation and then you look at the limestone and see the [imprints of] little shells. I love that kind of serendipity.”

Installing the limestone

The limestone used for the project was quarried and fabricated by Delta Stone and supplied and installed by Looking Good Masonry of Austin, TX. “We went out [to the site] and jointly field measured [with Delta Stone],” said Louis Hayn of Looking Good Masonry. “They brought the slabs and we did some onsite cutting as well.”

The installer explained that the limestone strips, which measured approximately 2 ½, 5 ½ and 8 inches, varied in size to line up with the brick coursing. Installing the stone pieces was done simultaneously with the brick.

“It went hand-in-hand,” said Hayn. “We laid up the brick and when it came time to stick in a piece of stone, we did.” The pieces were installed with split-tail stainless steel anchors.

The most challenging aspect of the limestone installation was protecting the finished work after it was completed, according to the installer. “Because of all the construction that was going on and the brick that went on top of it, we covered [the limestone] with wood boxes and left them in place until [the job was finished],” he said.

It only took Looking Good Masonry several days to install the limestone, while the brick masonry took approximately seven weeks, with about seven to eight workers on the job. “We do a lot of cut stone, so this was a simple little deal,” said Hayn.

In total, construction of the new Texas Hillel was completed in about a year. “This was a little bit of a labor of love,” said Alter, adding that talks about the new design began in 1999, but were held up at times due to funds. But, in the end, the project was a success. The building received a 2006 AIA Austin Merit Award and 2006 Texas Society of Architects Design Award.