Recently, talks have begun between the Marble Institute (MIA) and the Building Stone Institute (BSI) to explore the idea of merging their associations. The end goal would be to create a stronger advocate and more powerful resource for the stone industry. In my 26-plus years at Stone World, I have heard discussions like these before, but different attempts to bring the industry together have always stalled or halted altogether. The goal of specifically combining the MIA and BSI has not been achieved, mainly, because most associations or groups don’t want to lose their identity nor the passion for a cause that they suspect won’t be addressed without theirassociation’s vigilant effort. I can understand that.
Up until now, we have mostly maintained the status quo, with each group and association setting their own goals and missions. They have each achieved important results for their memberships. But then they must also each ask their members for dues, contributions, sponsorships and support for unexpected issues that need to be addressed. While this is only one area of concern for the various stone industry members who have historically supported all of these associations, it is a constant comment I hear from members of all types and sizes. Since I started at Stone World, I have heard rumblings from stone industry leaders who are members of several organizations, saying that it can be burdensome to give to, and support, so many different associations and industry efforts.